Happy Turkey, everyone and all.
The name of the game today is to tell you what I'm grateful for, but not in the once-around-the-table-at-Grandma's-house fashion.
To let the world (all five of you) know that I'm sincere, I'm going to attempt to express true gratitude only for things that I've never heard anyone else be thankful for aloud. Also, I'm not coming up with this list on the spot. That wouldn't be very grateful; brainstorming doesn't really communicate great depths of feeling. So, the second rule is that these are all things that I have actually noted and expressed appreciation for (even if only internally) in the past.
To review:
1. Never heard anyone else be grateful for the following items.
2. Have felt thankful for these items before today.
First, I am truly grateful for the smell of Tide white lilac detergent coupled with Downy lavender dryer sheets. I came across this combination when I was trying to develop a comprehensive smell strategy (CSS) for myself. It works. I love it. I often smell my clothes or blankets and think of how amazing it is that I live in a world where I have such clean and fresh smelling articles. Pre-20th century royalty could not have had it so good.
Second, I am thankful for the smell of old books--like "find it through the card catalog" kind of old books. It's so distinct and makes me feel like there is an exciting world around me still waiting to be discovered, but without the slightest bit of anxiousness or urgency. The books will always be there waiting for me.
Third: modern dentistry. Enough said.
Forth, I absolutely am happy to live in a world with Polo cologne. I don't use it. I can't afford it. And it doesn't fit into the CSS. But this is exactly the prototypical scent and essence of Man--what John Wayne would have smelled like all the time.
Fifth and finally, I am thankful for trunk space. Something about seeing a big, boxy, and deep trunk makes me really happy. I get all excited with the potential of all the things I could pack, stow, and carry, all with the greatest of ease. It's like a bonus car that quietly waits to continually surprise me.
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
Friday, November 20, 2009
Hodge Podge
These are things I would've mentioned to other human beings, if I was ever around other human beings. There is neither theme nor general cause for interest.
There is a billboard on I-15 northbound as you're coming into Salt Lake. It boasts, "Utah's Fastest Tattoo Removal!"
This claim has zero appeal to me. You know what? Go ahead and take your time. I can stay for fifteen extra minutes. Need me to make another appointment? That's fine. You are super heating and exploding ink in my flesh by use of high powered lasers. Take all the time you need.
I realized the other day that it will be nearly impossible for any woman to live up to the standard of love, devotion, loyalty, and appreciation my dogs have led me to expect.
The dogs are so willing to be fooled by me. They want to believe that I am the best person ever. They need to believe in an all powerful, benevolent master.
A picture of my mother cycled through my screen saver the other day. Something about it stirred my emotions. It's not the best picture of my mother. It's not the greatest likeness of her. It's not even the most emblematic picture of her. So what was it I found so moving? Then I realized, that particular picture reminds me of Abraham Lincoln.
Not in the chin-beard and stove-pipe hat kind of way, but in the lines carved and forged in the crucible of human experience kind of way. She looks patient, kind, good natured, spent in service, wise, and strong.
Also, I just found this:
There is a billboard on I-15 northbound as you're coming into Salt Lake. It boasts, "Utah's Fastest Tattoo Removal!"
This claim has zero appeal to me. You know what? Go ahead and take your time. I can stay for fifteen extra minutes. Need me to make another appointment? That's fine. You are super heating and exploding ink in my flesh by use of high powered lasers. Take all the time you need.
I realized the other day that it will be nearly impossible for any woman to live up to the standard of love, devotion, loyalty, and appreciation my dogs have led me to expect.
The dogs are so willing to be fooled by me. They want to believe that I am the best person ever. They need to believe in an all powerful, benevolent master.
A picture of my mother cycled through my screen saver the other day. Something about it stirred my emotions. It's not the best picture of my mother. It's not the greatest likeness of her. It's not even the most emblematic picture of her. So what was it I found so moving? Then I realized, that particular picture reminds me of Abraham Lincoln.
Not in the chin-beard and stove-pipe hat kind of way, but in the lines carved and forged in the crucible of human experience kind of way. She looks patient, kind, good natured, spent in service, wise, and strong.
Also, I just found this:
Thursday, November 19, 2009
Californian/Canadian Coping
In-n-Out Burger has spread it's tentacles into my hometown. I'm not really super excited. I like In-n-Out just fine, but it was as much a vacation-novelty as anything. Plus, as nice as it is to have it around, now I'll have to deal with a bunch of sideburned Laker fans and blond girls with big earrings congregating too close to home.
The real upside of this event is that I discovered how much I enjoy saying the name of the burgery in a Canadian accent: En-n-Oot, eh?
It's a small victory, but it's getting me through the day.
(Also, I just invented the word "burgery," which helps.)
The real upside of this event is that I discovered how much I enjoy saying the name of the burgery in a Canadian accent: En-n-Oot, eh?
It's a small victory, but it's getting me through the day.
(Also, I just invented the word "burgery," which helps.)
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
The Set Up
I’ve never been set-up—ever—but not for a lack of effort on behalf of a cast of hundreds of well-meaning family, friends, and acquaintances. Years ago attempted matchmaking was an occurrence, and usually only when the conversation turned to dating and singleness. Now attempts at matchmaking are a regularity, often coming in sneak attacks and out of context.
DANIEL
I had a set-up offer two days ago. I had one the day before that. I will probably get one later this week.
There are two theories at play to explain this market phenomenon. First, as I grow older I become more refined, mature, educated, and dignified. People want friends or family to end up with a catch like me—a man with a good chin, five weeks away from being a Juris Doctor, not addicted to video games, and willing to change a toilet paper roll. The second theory is much simpler and Occam approved: pity positively correlates with growing age and continued single status.
I suppose it doesn’t have to be one or the other. In any particular instance I could be the latter and the sacrificial woman the former, vice versa, or any combination thereof. The point is, regardless of the reason for this sea change of intermeddling I’m in a new economy, for the first time I am considering breaking from my hard and fast no-set-up rule.
Although I don’t relish the idea of an awkward date, what I really dislike about the notion of getting set-up are the potential third-party ramifications. I’ve seen other gals and guys be set up by friends; I’ve seen those gals and guys dislike the date; and for various reasons, the matchmaking friend takes this rejection as a form of first-person insult.
To avoid, mitigate, or assuage these potential collateral conflicts, I’m working on a contract. The idea is anyone who wants to set me up will be dissuaded—perhaps winnowing out the less serious and thoughtful—or will be pre-advised of all the ways this could go wrong, and avoid potential future shock.
Without further ado, here is my first attempt to draft what started as a joke and is now a semi-unfortunate possibility.
PREAMBLE
I, __________________, have proposed to arrange a meeting between DANIEL STAKER (hereafter “DS”) and a female previously unknown (hereafter “FPU”) to DS, for the purpose of inter-personal acquaintanceship, which, if found agreeable to both parties, may develop into romantic involvement that may or may not result in monogamous dating or marriage.
In attempting to set-up DS, I am assuming a fiduciary role with DS, and, as such, in this capacity I am bound to act according to the best interests of DS. Accordingly, I will make every attempt to uphold the quality of my current relationship with DS, and will explicitly respect his judgment and wishes, whether or not his judgments are explained or merely implicit.
Accordingly, I agree to each and all of the following terms, jointly and severally.
TERMS
1. I know and expect DS will thoroughly scrutinize FPU.
2. I know and expect DS’s judgments regarding and evaluations of FPU will be critical, may either be made almost immediately or after thorough investigation.
3. I understand and diligently support DS’s right to dislike, be disinterested in, be annoyed by, or simply not appreciate FPU for any reason whatsoever.
4. I understand DS may find FPU is unattractive, ugly, homely, or just alright.
5. I understand DS may find FPU is unintelligent, stupid, uninteresting, or just alright.
6. I understand DS will scrutinize FPU’s goals, morals, and values.
7. I understand that DS is not concerned with general principles of fairness and tolerance in the arena of dating and intimate relationships; DS believes dating is about personal fit, not general acceptance, and discrimination will occur.
8. Though DS will not act with malice, I understand DS may do something to hurt FPU’s feelings, make FPU cry, or otherwise frustrate or anger FPU.
9. I assert that I have a substantial reason for thinking it would be favorable for DS to get to know and date FPU.
a. A “substantial reason” is herein defined as possessing knowledge or strong and reasonable suspicion that both DS and FPU mutually hold material facts, attributes, or other characteristics generally considered important to a intimate relationship.
i. Substantial reasons include, but are not limited to, intelligence, goals, lifestyles, unique shared interests, and similar senses of humor.
ii. Substantial reasons do not include, and are not limited to, mutual singleness, height, shared religious membership by record, legal education, or any physical similarities.
iii. If it is not clear whether a reason is substantial, insubstantiality is presumed, and DS reserves final judgment as to all questions of substantiality.
10. I understand DS is under no obligation to disclose any details of any meetings, conversations, interactions, or lack thereof, between DS and FPU with me, any of my agents, or anyone at all.
11. I understand DS has no obligation to defend, justify, or explain any meetings, conversations, interactions, or lack thereof, between DS and FPU with me, any of my agents, or anyone at all.
12. I understand and accept without any personal offense that DS may not trust my judgment, taste, assessments, or advice, and may flatly reject any and all of the aforementioned without explanation, and may do forthrightly and without normal obligations of tact.
13. I will undertake every possible effort to avoid offense where offense was not intended, and will not allow myself to take offense on behalf of FPU.
14. I realize DS may be bad at handling relationships, and will be sympathetic to his inept actions and inactions.
15. I will not assume malice on the part of DS where none is explicitly expressed.
16. I will not side with FPU on any issue in dispute, but will remember that relationships are complicated, stories are inevitably one-sided, and perspectives are limited.
17. By signing this agreement I agree that all of my agents will also be herein bound thereby.
18. I hereby waive my right to appeal this agreement or have this agreement reviewed by any court of law, state authority, mediator, arbitrator, or any authority other than DS.
19. I hereby waive all civil claims associated with this agreement, short of gross negligence, and realize that I am receiving nothing in consideration for the waiving of such rights but the privilege of arranging a meeting with DS and FPU.
20. I consent that this agreement may not be altered except by consent of both parties, consisting of DS and myself.
EXECUTION
Signed on this the ____ day of _________, in the year ______, by:
X _______________________
Witnessed and approved as to form by:
X _______________________
Daniel Staker
INT. A NON-DESCRIPT HALLWAY. COULD BE AT AN OFFICE, SCHOOL, OR CHURCH—DAY
DANIEL is simply standing, minding his own business. BETTY a woman 5-10 years older than and previously unknown to DANIEL, walks abruptly up to him.BETTY
Hi, I don’t know we’ve met. I’m Betty. Are you single?
DANIEL
Hi. Uh... Maybe?
I had a set-up offer two days ago. I had one the day before that. I will probably get one later this week.
There are two theories at play to explain this market phenomenon. First, as I grow older I become more refined, mature, educated, and dignified. People want friends or family to end up with a catch like me—a man with a good chin, five weeks away from being a Juris Doctor, not addicted to video games, and willing to change a toilet paper roll. The second theory is much simpler and Occam approved: pity positively correlates with growing age and continued single status.
I suppose it doesn’t have to be one or the other. In any particular instance I could be the latter and the sacrificial woman the former, vice versa, or any combination thereof. The point is, regardless of the reason for this sea change of intermeddling I’m in a new economy, for the first time I am considering breaking from my hard and fast no-set-up rule.
Although I don’t relish the idea of an awkward date, what I really dislike about the notion of getting set-up are the potential third-party ramifications. I’ve seen other gals and guys be set up by friends; I’ve seen those gals and guys dislike the date; and for various reasons, the matchmaking friend takes this rejection as a form of first-person insult.
To avoid, mitigate, or assuage these potential collateral conflicts, I’m working on a contract. The idea is anyone who wants to set me up will be dissuaded—perhaps winnowing out the less serious and thoughtful—or will be pre-advised of all the ways this could go wrong, and avoid potential future shock.
Without further ado, here is my first attempt to draft what started as a joke and is now a semi-unfortunate possibility.
PREAMBLE
I, __________________, have proposed to arrange a meeting between DANIEL STAKER (hereafter “DS”) and a female previously unknown (hereafter “FPU”) to DS, for the purpose of inter-personal acquaintanceship, which, if found agreeable to both parties, may develop into romantic involvement that may or may not result in monogamous dating or marriage.
In attempting to set-up DS, I am assuming a fiduciary role with DS, and, as such, in this capacity I am bound to act according to the best interests of DS. Accordingly, I will make every attempt to uphold the quality of my current relationship with DS, and will explicitly respect his judgment and wishes, whether or not his judgments are explained or merely implicit.
Accordingly, I agree to each and all of the following terms, jointly and severally.
TERMS
1. I know and expect DS will thoroughly scrutinize FPU.
2. I know and expect DS’s judgments regarding and evaluations of FPU will be critical, may either be made almost immediately or after thorough investigation.
3. I understand and diligently support DS’s right to dislike, be disinterested in, be annoyed by, or simply not appreciate FPU for any reason whatsoever.
4. I understand DS may find FPU is unattractive, ugly, homely, or just alright.
5. I understand DS may find FPU is unintelligent, stupid, uninteresting, or just alright.
6. I understand DS will scrutinize FPU’s goals, morals, and values.
7. I understand that DS is not concerned with general principles of fairness and tolerance in the arena of dating and intimate relationships; DS believes dating is about personal fit, not general acceptance, and discrimination will occur.
8. Though DS will not act with malice, I understand DS may do something to hurt FPU’s feelings, make FPU cry, or otherwise frustrate or anger FPU.
9. I assert that I have a substantial reason for thinking it would be favorable for DS to get to know and date FPU.
a. A “substantial reason” is herein defined as possessing knowledge or strong and reasonable suspicion that both DS and FPU mutually hold material facts, attributes, or other characteristics generally considered important to a intimate relationship.
i. Substantial reasons include, but are not limited to, intelligence, goals, lifestyles, unique shared interests, and similar senses of humor.
ii. Substantial reasons do not include, and are not limited to, mutual singleness, height, shared religious membership by record, legal education, or any physical similarities.
iii. If it is not clear whether a reason is substantial, insubstantiality is presumed, and DS reserves final judgment as to all questions of substantiality.
10. I understand DS is under no obligation to disclose any details of any meetings, conversations, interactions, or lack thereof, between DS and FPU with me, any of my agents, or anyone at all.
11. I understand DS has no obligation to defend, justify, or explain any meetings, conversations, interactions, or lack thereof, between DS and FPU with me, any of my agents, or anyone at all.
12. I understand and accept without any personal offense that DS may not trust my judgment, taste, assessments, or advice, and may flatly reject any and all of the aforementioned without explanation, and may do forthrightly and without normal obligations of tact.
13. I will undertake every possible effort to avoid offense where offense was not intended, and will not allow myself to take offense on behalf of FPU.
14. I realize DS may be bad at handling relationships, and will be sympathetic to his inept actions and inactions.
15. I will not assume malice on the part of DS where none is explicitly expressed.
16. I will not side with FPU on any issue in dispute, but will remember that relationships are complicated, stories are inevitably one-sided, and perspectives are limited.
17. By signing this agreement I agree that all of my agents will also be herein bound thereby.
18. I hereby waive my right to appeal this agreement or have this agreement reviewed by any court of law, state authority, mediator, arbitrator, or any authority other than DS.
19. I hereby waive all civil claims associated with this agreement, short of gross negligence, and realize that I am receiving nothing in consideration for the waiving of such rights but the privilege of arranging a meeting with DS and FPU.
20. I consent that this agreement may not be altered except by consent of both parties, consisting of DS and myself.
EXECUTION
Signed on this the ____ day of _________, in the year ______, by:
X _______________________
Witnessed and approved as to form by:
X _______________________
Daniel Staker
Monday, November 2, 2009
Dog Stars
While (as mentioned) I don't really care for reality tv, I do really care about dogs, particularly my dogs, and I love a good competition.
That, along with a bumpy childhood, may help explain why I've been trying to come up with a format for a reality-show-esque competition for my dogs. Meet the contenders:
On the left we have Ms. Gretel, a mutt with moxie, the brown tiger. (Not to be confused with this guy...)
On the right is Mr. Myshkin, 21 pounds of Jack-attack. (Not to be confused with this guy...)
I am trying to think up some challenges and a way to turn them against each other for my amusement, but intrigue is a hard thing to teach a dog.
It may be a good thing I don't have children. However, if I did have kids, I wouldn't be tempted to make my own nativity pageant with canines. Lest you think I'm kidding, check out the shepherd prototype.
You cannot imagine how much this warms my heart, but, do not fear, I've told myself I won't let it go past shepherds and donkeys.
That, along with a bumpy childhood, may help explain why I've been trying to come up with a format for a reality-show-esque competition for my dogs. Meet the contenders:
On the left we have Ms. Gretel, a mutt with moxie, the brown tiger. (Not to be confused with this guy...)
On the right is Mr. Myshkin, 21 pounds of Jack-attack. (Not to be confused with this guy...)
I am trying to think up some challenges and a way to turn them against each other for my amusement, but intrigue is a hard thing to teach a dog.
It may be a good thing I don't have children. However, if I did have kids, I wouldn't be tempted to make my own nativity pageant with canines. Lest you think I'm kidding, check out the shepherd prototype.
You cannot imagine how much this warms my heart, but, do not fear, I've told myself I won't let it go past shepherds and donkeys.
8 & 9
Monday, October 26, 2009
7 Inappropriate Confessions
Prepare for disappointment. Not inappropriate in the sense of scintillating tales of moral indiscretion, rather inappropriate in that these are things I shouldn't feel any need to confess, and yet... I do. Almost daily.
1. I cannot finish a half gallon of milk before it expires. I've been trying for years, and while I have flirted in the high ninety-percents of completion, I have yet to seal the deal.
2. I never completed Super Mario Brothers, and I really, really tried. It was the only video game I owned for a year.
3. I hate and cannot stand reality tv--in fact I've never watched an entire reality tv show on my own--and yet, filled with some self-loathing, I have watched hours of it because of female companionship. (There is one exception to this, but that I will not confess.)
4. I don't know what band you are talking about. Furthermore, it took me a few minutes to figure out you were talking about a band.
5. I haven't seen the movie your talking about, and there is a 90% chance I really don't want to--it's violent, hyper sexual, inane and/or people say bad swears a lot.
6. But I would still watch Caveman, staring Shelly Long and Ringo Starr, and I am well aware that it falls into at least two of the above criteria.
7. I've seen the movie Caveman.
1. I cannot finish a half gallon of milk before it expires. I've been trying for years, and while I have flirted in the high ninety-percents of completion, I have yet to seal the deal.
2. I never completed Super Mario Brothers, and I really, really tried. It was the only video game I owned for a year.
3. I hate and cannot stand reality tv--in fact I've never watched an entire reality tv show on my own--and yet, filled with some self-loathing, I have watched hours of it because of female companionship. (There is one exception to this, but that I will not confess.)
4. I don't know what band you are talking about. Furthermore, it took me a few minutes to figure out you were talking about a band.
5. I haven't seen the movie your talking about, and there is a 90% chance I really don't want to--it's violent, hyper sexual, inane and/or people say bad swears a lot.
6. But I would still watch Caveman, staring Shelly Long and Ringo Starr, and I am well aware that it falls into at least two of the above criteria.
7. I've seen the movie Caveman.
Thursday, October 22, 2009
Musing on Modern Life
This:
"I'm sorry. I'm no longer interested. You are simply not as good looking or nearly as skinny as your internet photographs led me to believe."
Should be a valid way to end a relationship. (Whether or not the internet is a valid place to begin a relationship is a whole other matter recognized hereby, but not addressed herein.)
Somehow we are currently in a social landscape where one can wantonly and willfully deceive, but it's not ok for the the deceived to acknowledge the deception. Thus, making a victim twice over.
At least with alcohol people traditionally brought deception upon themselves.
Ironically the information age has promoted only the artful presentation of information, often misinformation, and has eroded the kind of genuine discovery and fact-finding that comes from real-life human contact and interaction. This kind of freedom to misrepresent is at an all time high.
I'm sure this has more troubling ramifications than determinations of "hot or not," but I'm a simple man, and am merely endeavoring to point out the surface of the iceberg. (Which, considering where this post began, seems an apt analogy.)
"I'm sorry. I'm no longer interested. You are simply not as good looking or nearly as skinny as your internet photographs led me to believe."
Should be a valid way to end a relationship. (Whether or not the internet is a valid place to begin a relationship is a whole other matter recognized hereby, but not addressed herein.)
Somehow we are currently in a social landscape where one can wantonly and willfully deceive, but it's not ok for the the deceived to acknowledge the deception. Thus, making a victim twice over.
At least with alcohol people traditionally brought deception upon themselves.
Ironically the information age has promoted only the artful presentation of information, often misinformation, and has eroded the kind of genuine discovery and fact-finding that comes from real-life human contact and interaction. This kind of freedom to misrepresent is at an all time high.
I'm sure this has more troubling ramifications than determinations of "hot or not," but I'm a simple man, and am merely endeavoring to point out the surface of the iceberg. (Which, considering where this post began, seems an apt analogy.)
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
Killer Serials--The Ghost of Al Capone is My Roommate
Part V--Dissolution
***Do Not Read Before Parts I-IV***
I had not left my bedroom for weeks and weeks. It's not only that I was afraid of Al--the last time I saw him he did vow, "I'll fill you so full of lead they'll use you for a pencil, nyah!"--but I also couldn't remember the secret knock to get into the living room. Every time I tried all I heard back was a voice from the other side yelling something like, "Nice try, copper!"
I couldn't pay my bills. The power and heat went off, but at least my cell phone service was canceled, freeing me from my real-life Geraldo haunting. The speakeasy went on by candlelight. It only added to the allure and the dolls said it all seemed more dangerous and romantic.
Meanwhile I nearly starved to death, living only off of cough drops from my medicine cabinet, water from my sink, and remnants of gin that a ghost named Vinny comes in and makes in my bathtub.
Al had a good thing going. With me out of the way, he had the only 1920s-era-supernatural-speakeasy in the building, maybe on the whole block. His empire was growing day by day, but, in his haste to get back on top, Al forgot to pay his H.O.A. dues.
After an appropriate administrative process, Al and I were evicted by the Chicago P.D. I lost my job and my home, but, most importantly, I also lost Al.
As I walked away he yelled something about turning me into "minestrone soup" if I ever double crossed him or cut back into his territory. Typical Al. He would almost be tolerable, lovable, if he weren't so willing to take human life for profit.
My new home used to be a Hallmark Store. Me and all the precious moments figures gone by should get along just fine.
***Do Not Read Before Parts I-IV***
I had not left my bedroom for weeks and weeks. It's not only that I was afraid of Al--the last time I saw him he did vow, "I'll fill you so full of lead they'll use you for a pencil, nyah!"--but I also couldn't remember the secret knock to get into the living room. Every time I tried all I heard back was a voice from the other side yelling something like, "Nice try, copper!"
I couldn't pay my bills. The power and heat went off, but at least my cell phone service was canceled, freeing me from my real-life Geraldo haunting. The speakeasy went on by candlelight. It only added to the allure and the dolls said it all seemed more dangerous and romantic.
Meanwhile I nearly starved to death, living only off of cough drops from my medicine cabinet, water from my sink, and remnants of gin that a ghost named Vinny comes in and makes in my bathtub.
Al had a good thing going. With me out of the way, he had the only 1920s-era-supernatural-speakeasy in the building, maybe on the whole block. His empire was growing day by day, but, in his haste to get back on top, Al forgot to pay his H.O.A. dues.
After an appropriate administrative process, Al and I were evicted by the Chicago P.D. I lost my job and my home, but, most importantly, I also lost Al.
As I walked away he yelled something about turning me into "minestrone soup" if I ever double crossed him or cut back into his territory. Typical Al. He would almost be tolerable, lovable, if he weren't so willing to take human life for profit.
My new home used to be a Hallmark Store. Me and all the precious moments figures gone by should get along just fine.
Monday, August 10, 2009
Killer Serials--Al Capone's Ghost is My Roommate
Part IV--Geraldo's Comeback
***Do Not Read Before Parts I-III Below***
I sleep a lot now. Nearly every spare chance I get.
It's 9:07 AM on Saturday, June 27th, and the voicemail alert on my phone has been beeping at me for hours. I don't want to get up; I don't want to leave the bedroom; yet I can't fall back to sleep. In my head I'm arguing with him, back and forth, because I don't have the nerve to argue with him in person.
My hand falls onto the nightstand and I grope for the voicemail button on my phone.
The message lady: "You have 23 new messages..."
Friday, June 26th, 8:37 PM. Beep.
"Hello, Mr. Edwards. My name is Terry Steinagle, assistant to Geraldo Rivera. Mr. Rivera heard about your... issue... and he would be very interested in meeting with you. If you could please..."
Message deleted. Next message: Friday, June 26th, 8:55 PM. Beep.
"Hello, Mr. Edwards. It's Terry Steinagle again. Just checking to see if you got my earlier..."
Message deleted. Next message: Friday, June 26th, 9:22 PM. Beep.
"Terry again. Is there a better number to reach you at? I've been trying to get a hold of you for a couple days now and...
Message deleted. Next message: Friday, June 26th, 9:38. PM. Beep.
"Mr. Edwards we are very eager to obtain the exclusive rights to your..."
Message deleted. Next message: Friday, June 26th, 10:01. PM. Beep.
"If you think you can just ignore the personal assistant to Mr. Rivera and..."
Message deleted. Next message: Friday, June 26th, 10:34 PM. Beep.
"Well, Mr. Edwards, I'm sorry we couldn't get in touch with you today. If you get this, I'll be awake until..."
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 5:52 AM. Beep.
"Good Morning, Mr. Edwards. I know that things so far haven't gone as well as..."
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 6:47 AM. Beep.
"Mr. Edwards, it's Terry again. Just getting Mr. Rivera's coffee ready and would love to wake him up to some good new..."
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 6:51 AM. Beep.
"Hey, I just ran down to grab the paper and thought you might have tried to call while I was..."
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 7:39 AM. Beep.
"This is rude. Plain and simple rude. Now Mr. Rivera is starting to get upset. And I'm warning you..."
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 8:04 AM. Beep.
"Anthony, it's me, Geraldo. I know you're there...
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 8:07 AM. Beep.
"Sorry, your machine cut me off. So, I was saying, on prime-time, probably a three part series..."
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 8:10 AM. Beep.
"Like I said, on Fox news with the option to be picked up by the mother network..."
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 8:13 AM. Beep.
"...because you and I are businessmen, you know? I think we understand one another..."
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 8:16 AM. Beep.
"And you have no idea how bad I need this, kid. A comeback. To get me back on top, back where..."
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 8:19 AM. Beep.
"And don't think for a second that I'll let some little jerk like you stand in the way of my comeback. I leave particles of guys like you in my..."
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 8:22 AM. Beep.
"And you know how it goes when you want something with all your heart. You can get a little crazy and you might say some things that you regret later..."
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 8:25 AM. Beep.
"Oh, come on. Please, kid? Please? You have no idea how bad I..."
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 8:28 AM. Beep.
"Ok, it doesn't have to be a three-part series if you don't want. We could do one live special on..."
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 8:31 AM. Beep.
"What if I just open up the fridge? And I could say something like, 'Ah ha!' and we could flip the lights on and off for..."
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 8:34 AM. Beep.
"One tape recorder left in your breakfast cereal cupboard overnight..."
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 8:37 AM. Beep.
"Listen you snot-nosed, SOB, when you mess with the mustache you mess..."
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 8:49 AM. Beep.
"You know, there are other ways you could be compensated..."
I think I'm going to be sick.
I have to wonder why on earth did I go to a psychiatrist who was related to Geraldo Rivera? How is anyone related to Geraldo even allowed to practice medicine in a civilized country?
***Do Not Read Before Parts I-III Below***
I sleep a lot now. Nearly every spare chance I get.
It's 9:07 AM on Saturday, June 27th, and the voicemail alert on my phone has been beeping at me for hours. I don't want to get up; I don't want to leave the bedroom; yet I can't fall back to sleep. In my head I'm arguing with him, back and forth, because I don't have the nerve to argue with him in person.
My hand falls onto the nightstand and I grope for the voicemail button on my phone.
The message lady: "You have 23 new messages..."
Friday, June 26th, 8:37 PM. Beep.
"Hello, Mr. Edwards. My name is Terry Steinagle, assistant to Geraldo Rivera. Mr. Rivera heard about your... issue... and he would be very interested in meeting with you. If you could please..."
Message deleted. Next message: Friday, June 26th, 8:55 PM. Beep.
"Hello, Mr. Edwards. It's Terry Steinagle again. Just checking to see if you got my earlier..."
Message deleted. Next message: Friday, June 26th, 9:22 PM. Beep.
"Terry again. Is there a better number to reach you at? I've been trying to get a hold of you for a couple days now and...
Message deleted. Next message: Friday, June 26th, 9:38. PM. Beep.
"Mr. Edwards we are very eager to obtain the exclusive rights to your..."
Message deleted. Next message: Friday, June 26th, 10:01. PM. Beep.
"If you think you can just ignore the personal assistant to Mr. Rivera and..."
Message deleted. Next message: Friday, June 26th, 10:34 PM. Beep.
"Well, Mr. Edwards, I'm sorry we couldn't get in touch with you today. If you get this, I'll be awake until..."
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 5:52 AM. Beep.
"Good Morning, Mr. Edwards. I know that things so far haven't gone as well as..."
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 6:47 AM. Beep.
"Mr. Edwards, it's Terry again. Just getting Mr. Rivera's coffee ready and would love to wake him up to some good new..."
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 6:51 AM. Beep.
"Hey, I just ran down to grab the paper and thought you might have tried to call while I was..."
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 7:39 AM. Beep.
"This is rude. Plain and simple rude. Now Mr. Rivera is starting to get upset. And I'm warning you..."
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 8:04 AM. Beep.
"Anthony, it's me, Geraldo. I know you're there...
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 8:07 AM. Beep.
"Sorry, your machine cut me off. So, I was saying, on prime-time, probably a three part series..."
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 8:10 AM. Beep.
"Like I said, on Fox news with the option to be picked up by the mother network..."
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 8:13 AM. Beep.
"...because you and I are businessmen, you know? I think we understand one another..."
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 8:16 AM. Beep.
"And you have no idea how bad I need this, kid. A comeback. To get me back on top, back where..."
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 8:19 AM. Beep.
"And don't think for a second that I'll let some little jerk like you stand in the way of my comeback. I leave particles of guys like you in my..."
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 8:22 AM. Beep.
"And you know how it goes when you want something with all your heart. You can get a little crazy and you might say some things that you regret later..."
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 8:25 AM. Beep.
"Oh, come on. Please, kid? Please? You have no idea how bad I..."
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 8:28 AM. Beep.
"Ok, it doesn't have to be a three-part series if you don't want. We could do one live special on..."
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 8:31 AM. Beep.
"What if I just open up the fridge? And I could say something like, 'Ah ha!' and we could flip the lights on and off for..."
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 8:34 AM. Beep.
"One tape recorder left in your breakfast cereal cupboard overnight..."
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 8:37 AM. Beep.
"Listen you snot-nosed, SOB, when you mess with the mustache you mess..."
Message deleted. Next message: Saturday, June 27th, 8:49 AM. Beep.
"You know, there are other ways you could be compensated..."
I think I'm going to be sick.
I have to wonder why on earth did I go to a psychiatrist who was related to Geraldo Rivera? How is anyone related to Geraldo even allowed to practice medicine in a civilized country?
Tuesday, July 28, 2009
Killers Serial--The Ghost of Al Capone Is My Roommate
Part III: See!
***DO NOT READ BEFORE PARTS I & II BELOW***
Federal taxes move through the economy like a dead chicken through a snake. In early winter H&R Block hires a small army of temporary help from coast to coast. Throughout March and April accountants work sixty, seventy, eighty-hour weeks. The post office sees a spike in business, and stays open late on April 15, one day out of 365. And a new paralegal at the Internal Revenue Service begins to have his summer ruined, as the workload is shifted from the accountants and the general public to my desk.
I’ve been facing unusual stress for a few months: a mountain of student loan debt, a new mortgage, settling for a job after a disheartening and unflattering search, moving to a new city, the growing list of items my condo builder needs to come fix, the growing anxiety of someone who deep-down knows he will never get around to presenting the builder with the growing list of repairs… All of this explains why the first time I heard Al speak, I thought it was merely evidence of the stressful status quo, and not in-and-of-itself a brand new stress.
On Friday, June 12, I had a bit of break down. Lonely and unhappy, I did the only thing that made sense; I walked all the way home from work, picking up a large pizza and box of Hostess doughnuts along the way, and stayed up through the night watching progressively mindless television. Right through the door I shed my shirt, tie, pants, and dignity. Everything—clothes, food, and a broken man in a white undershirt, pale blue boxers, and black dress socks—fell to the floor.
We stayed there throughout the night, rearranging our positions, like decimated platoons of soldiers heroically and fatally determined to see the battle through to the end. As a Julie Roberts romantic comedy (I don’t know which one) ended on TBS, the pizza box laid reassuringly on my chest, moving up with my breath. For the 1:00 AM SportsCenter, the pizza box stayed faithfully to my right flank, just within arms reach, and the doughnuts moved to my chest, the corner of the box torn off and the contents lighter than moments ago. Slice by slice, “O” by “O”, our numbers dwindled as we made it through the infomercial hours together. At 4:00, the boxes nearly empty, the casualties of crumbs, crusts, and soda cans spread across my cheep wood floor and Ikea rug, things started looking up as classic cartoons worked their way into the cable lineup.
It was nearly 5:00 and light was returning to the city. With equal parts solace and sadness—glad because some kind of storm had been weathered, but depressed because a whole night and normal sleep schedule had been foolishly sacrificed—I gathered my strength for one last meal before giving into exhaustion and sleep.
With Looney Tunes filling the front room, I staggered over to the kitchen side of the open condo space. Without thought, moving on autopilot, I collected cereal box, bowl, and spoon, and set them on the counter. I opened the fridge a mere crack, when a voice in front of me rang strong, nasal, and gravelly.
“See!”
In one sudden movement that I cannot image and could not replicate, I slammed the door shut and jumped back into the island, tumbled over the counter top, and landed firmly on both feet in a kind of tennis-player-awaiting-serve stance.
My heart pounded, my pupils dilated, and time slowed down. After my initial burst of reaction, I didn’t move a muscle. I’m not even sure if I was breathing. I only stood, listening, crouching, and waiting for another sound.
The TV was still on.
I felt like an idiot when I finally turned around to see Bugs Bunny wearing a fedora, pacing around a confused Elmer Fudd, speaking like a prohibition era gangster. Tingling from head to toe with relief, I turned the TV off and made my second attempt to open the fridge.
“I have got to go to bed,” I said aloud to myself.
A streak of light broke along the edges of the large stainless steel appliance before me, and a my statement was met with a non sequitur reply: “Nyah! What’s the big idea?!”
I don’t know why it started in the fridge. Must be some kind of Ghost Busters rule.
I didn’t stop to think about it at the time. Seconds later I had abandoned my breakfast plans, closed and locked the bedroom door, and hit the bed determined to sleep for as long as I possibly could.
***DO NOT READ BEFORE PARTS I & II BELOW***
Federal taxes move through the economy like a dead chicken through a snake. In early winter H&R Block hires a small army of temporary help from coast to coast. Throughout March and April accountants work sixty, seventy, eighty-hour weeks. The post office sees a spike in business, and stays open late on April 15, one day out of 365. And a new paralegal at the Internal Revenue Service begins to have his summer ruined, as the workload is shifted from the accountants and the general public to my desk.
I’ve been facing unusual stress for a few months: a mountain of student loan debt, a new mortgage, settling for a job after a disheartening and unflattering search, moving to a new city, the growing list of items my condo builder needs to come fix, the growing anxiety of someone who deep-down knows he will never get around to presenting the builder with the growing list of repairs… All of this explains why the first time I heard Al speak, I thought it was merely evidence of the stressful status quo, and not in-and-of-itself a brand new stress.
On Friday, June 12, I had a bit of break down. Lonely and unhappy, I did the only thing that made sense; I walked all the way home from work, picking up a large pizza and box of Hostess doughnuts along the way, and stayed up through the night watching progressively mindless television. Right through the door I shed my shirt, tie, pants, and dignity. Everything—clothes, food, and a broken man in a white undershirt, pale blue boxers, and black dress socks—fell to the floor.
We stayed there throughout the night, rearranging our positions, like decimated platoons of soldiers heroically and fatally determined to see the battle through to the end. As a Julie Roberts romantic comedy (I don’t know which one) ended on TBS, the pizza box laid reassuringly on my chest, moving up with my breath. For the 1:00 AM SportsCenter, the pizza box stayed faithfully to my right flank, just within arms reach, and the doughnuts moved to my chest, the corner of the box torn off and the contents lighter than moments ago. Slice by slice, “O” by “O”, our numbers dwindled as we made it through the infomercial hours together. At 4:00, the boxes nearly empty, the casualties of crumbs, crusts, and soda cans spread across my cheep wood floor and Ikea rug, things started looking up as classic cartoons worked their way into the cable lineup.
It was nearly 5:00 and light was returning to the city. With equal parts solace and sadness—glad because some kind of storm had been weathered, but depressed because a whole night and normal sleep schedule had been foolishly sacrificed—I gathered my strength for one last meal before giving into exhaustion and sleep.
With Looney Tunes filling the front room, I staggered over to the kitchen side of the open condo space. Without thought, moving on autopilot, I collected cereal box, bowl, and spoon, and set them on the counter. I opened the fridge a mere crack, when a voice in front of me rang strong, nasal, and gravelly.
“See!”
In one sudden movement that I cannot image and could not replicate, I slammed the door shut and jumped back into the island, tumbled over the counter top, and landed firmly on both feet in a kind of tennis-player-awaiting-serve stance.
My heart pounded, my pupils dilated, and time slowed down. After my initial burst of reaction, I didn’t move a muscle. I’m not even sure if I was breathing. I only stood, listening, crouching, and waiting for another sound.
The TV was still on.
I felt like an idiot when I finally turned around to see Bugs Bunny wearing a fedora, pacing around a confused Elmer Fudd, speaking like a prohibition era gangster. Tingling from head to toe with relief, I turned the TV off and made my second attempt to open the fridge.
“I have got to go to bed,” I said aloud to myself.
A streak of light broke along the edges of the large stainless steel appliance before me, and a my statement was met with a non sequitur reply: “Nyah! What’s the big idea?!”
I don’t know why it started in the fridge. Must be some kind of Ghost Busters rule.
I didn’t stop to think about it at the time. Seconds later I had abandoned my breakfast plans, closed and locked the bedroom door, and hit the bed determined to sleep for as long as I possibly could.
Tuesday, June 30, 2009
Dogma and Dog Days of Summer
I hate to interrupt the Killer's Serial (not because anyone is reading it or waiting on the next installment, but just because I hate disorder), nevertheless I came across something today that I felt worth promoting.
Let me begin by saying that I hate, hate, hate political dogma. My personal innermost circle of hell is filled neck deep with letters to the editor, Hannitys, Colmes', Rushs, and people who think NPR is infallible.
I learned at BYU that I could tolerate any political opinion, so long as anyone could demonstrate to me that he or she had actually considered the issues involved with the opinion rather than the mantras, statements, and catchphrases.
The last thing the world, or any democracy, needs is one more drone screaming "No blood for oil!" or "Illegal immigration is illegal!"
If we are polarized as a nation, and we are getting there, then what right, what outrageous audacity, does anyone claim that would entitle them to paint the other half of the population as idiots? What makes you so much smarter? Especially if you cannot even see the merits of opinions held by the other half?
Any issue worthy of public debate has very valid reasons for support and disapproval.
That said, I'm sick of hearing claims and barbs about climate change from people who could not tell a p-value from a pea pod, and from folks who have never once cracked a peer reviewed publication. Furthermore, even if we were to learn some generations later that climate change is a grand fraud perpetuated by mass hysteria in the international scientific community; even if any measure we can take to reduce pollution pales in comparison to the negative impacts of third world industrialization; even if a drive toward pollution reduction is paternalistic and keeps the proletariat nations bound to cheap production for the bourgeoisie; why not make an effort to do what's right and reduce pollution on our end in general? Not because we have to in order to avoid a dooms day. Not because we can certainly make a great impact. But because we can do something.
Just because the commons lies covered in tragedy, is that any justification for us not to pull back and corral whatever cows we are able?
Is there anyone willing to argue that pollution is beneficial? Should potential ecomonic impacts drive all our decisions? Surely you've given up money hundreds of times this year in consideration of a higher quality of life. So why dig in your heals and fight conservation just because the guy on AM radio says Obama is a fascist?
For shame. Conservation should be a general principle of a prudent life, whether in terms of environment, energy, finances, materials, or any resource. And what ever happened to our national sense of stewardship?
How is drawing more heavily against nature's balance (which we are doing to some degree unless you actually believe pollution is beneficial environmentally) for economic consideration any less blameworthy than leaving behind a legacy of debt for your children to promote some current ease? (And don't try to argue entitlement spending here--it needs to be addressed too; I don't dispute that--it has nothing to do with the wholesale mortgage of environmental quality the world has been bent on since the industrial revolution.)
So, though I hate, hate, hate politically inflammatory rhetoric, I actually found this article really satisfying. (Though use of the "T" word was obnoxious.)
New York Times: "Betraying the Planet"
Let me begin by saying that I hate, hate, hate political dogma. My personal innermost circle of hell is filled neck deep with letters to the editor, Hannitys, Colmes', Rushs, and people who think NPR is infallible.
I learned at BYU that I could tolerate any political opinion, so long as anyone could demonstrate to me that he or she had actually considered the issues involved with the opinion rather than the mantras, statements, and catchphrases.
The last thing the world, or any democracy, needs is one more drone screaming "No blood for oil!" or "Illegal immigration is illegal!"
If we are polarized as a nation, and we are getting there, then what right, what outrageous audacity, does anyone claim that would entitle them to paint the other half of the population as idiots? What makes you so much smarter? Especially if you cannot even see the merits of opinions held by the other half?
Any issue worthy of public debate has very valid reasons for support and disapproval.
That said, I'm sick of hearing claims and barbs about climate change from people who could not tell a p-value from a pea pod, and from folks who have never once cracked a peer reviewed publication. Furthermore, even if we were to learn some generations later that climate change is a grand fraud perpetuated by mass hysteria in the international scientific community; even if any measure we can take to reduce pollution pales in comparison to the negative impacts of third world industrialization; even if a drive toward pollution reduction is paternalistic and keeps the proletariat nations bound to cheap production for the bourgeoisie; why not make an effort to do what's right and reduce pollution on our end in general? Not because we have to in order to avoid a dooms day. Not because we can certainly make a great impact. But because we can do something.
Just because the commons lies covered in tragedy, is that any justification for us not to pull back and corral whatever cows we are able?
Is there anyone willing to argue that pollution is beneficial? Should potential ecomonic impacts drive all our decisions? Surely you've given up money hundreds of times this year in consideration of a higher quality of life. So why dig in your heals and fight conservation just because the guy on AM radio says Obama is a fascist?
For shame. Conservation should be a general principle of a prudent life, whether in terms of environment, energy, finances, materials, or any resource. And what ever happened to our national sense of stewardship?
How is drawing more heavily against nature's balance (which we are doing to some degree unless you actually believe pollution is beneficial environmentally) for economic consideration any less blameworthy than leaving behind a legacy of debt for your children to promote some current ease? (And don't try to argue entitlement spending here--it needs to be addressed too; I don't dispute that--it has nothing to do with the wholesale mortgage of environmental quality the world has been bent on since the industrial revolution.)
So, though I hate, hate, hate politically inflammatory rhetoric, I actually found this article really satisfying. (Though use of the "T" word was obnoxious.)
New York Times: "Betraying the Planet"
Saturday, June 27, 2009
Killer Serials--The Ghost of Al Capone is My Roommate
Part II--The Lexington Hotel
***Do Not Read Before Part I***
I'm not a historian; I'm not even from Chicago. I'm just a condo owner.
Last April I became a fighting Mondale alumnus when I graduated from the University of Minnesota Law school. Spring 2009 was a rough time to hit the job market, especially for a Mondale, like me, who was in the bottom half of his class. The job hunt was humiliating and slow, and after a month all my best supporters--mom, dad, aunt Karen--began to lose any trace of hope when they would talk to me about the hunt. It wasn't until late May that I found a job, not as a lawyer, and not at a high power law firm, but as a paralegal for the IRS in Chicago.
When people would ask I would say I was taking a job with the federal government and tell them nothing more. I didn't have the heart to tell anyone (who I thought wouldn't find out) that I was going to be looking up cases and photocopying reports for real attorneys. But, disappointing as it was, federal jobs mean federal pay scales, and the money, though it wouldn't compare to private work, was not too bad. Not bad at all for a guy who had $120,000 in loan debt and had gone two months without any job offers. Although heartbreaking, the decision was easy. I was off to the Second City to enter the exciting world of tax law research.
On the day I arrived in town I extended my debt even more by signing closing papers for a Lexington Park condominium, unit 1947. It was my very own one bedroom with den in the heart of Chicago's southside, "starting in the low 200s."
Lexington Park was named after the Lexington Hotel, which sat on the same plot of ground until 1995. It's probably alright to name a residential building after the old hotel, but you wouldn't want to name your kid after it. The Lexington Hotel had a shady history, at best.
Built in 1892 for the opening of the World's Columbian Exposition, perhaps better known as the Chicago World's Fair, the hotel was supposed to provide luxury residences and accommodations to fair guests. With the closing of the fair, demand substantially fell. Once it was discovered that the hotel was just down Indiana Ave. from H.H. Holmes's infamous "murder castle," demand died, and the hotel fell into disrepair. This is probably why a young, up-and-coming entrepreneur decided to pick up the property on the cheap and establish his headquarters there.
In 1928 Al Capone bought the Lexington Hotel, placed armed guards all along the bottom floor and all around the block, and ran his criminal empire from 22nd Street (later renamed) and Michigan Ave. The hotel would serve as his headquarters until Capone was arrested in 1938, and shipped off to Alcatraz where his body and mind would slowly be ravaged by syphilis. The hotel would outlast Capone, but didn't fair much better.
The associations between the Lexington Hotel, crime, Capone, and Chicago's seedy underside were two strong. With no other entrepreneurs chomping at the bit, the hotel slide into a brothel, and then a low-rent residential hotel, which is a nice way of saying crack/flop house. The Lexington Hotel was declared blight and the city condemned it in 1980. For fifteen years it sat vacant, it's only wholesome use being as a back drop in the photographs of old tourists, mostly men who remembered seeing Capone's exploits on the news reels as small boys.
In 1995 the Lexington was finally demolished, razed clean to the ground. The building was a historical site, and a lot of old Chicagoans were angry at the time, but the city had had enough of the rats and drug dealers that infested the area. A decade would pass before the recollections of the prostitutes, crimes, and mob bosses were sufficiently vanished. Buildings can be torn down faster than memories. In a turn of good fortune, the southside started to become revitalized, just in time for the White Sox to bring home the 2005 World Series trophy and set it on the Chicago mantel. Pleased with the change they saw, the Chieftain Construction company decided the Lexington lot had sat fallow long enough. In 2007 ground was broken for thirty-one stories of trendy urban condos--a whole tower of glass, faux granite, and stainless steel appliances.
When I moved here I didn't know anything about H.H. Holmes, mobsters, or the Lexington Hotel brothel. Even if I had known, I wouldn't have changed my decision. I'm not superstitious. A few months ago I would have been happy to learn they built the place on an Indian graveyard; it would've given me a decent little bargaining chip when I was negotiating the price in the low 200s.
***Do Not Read Before Part I***
I'm not a historian; I'm not even from Chicago. I'm just a condo owner.
Last April I became a fighting Mondale alumnus when I graduated from the University of Minnesota Law school. Spring 2009 was a rough time to hit the job market, especially for a Mondale, like me, who was in the bottom half of his class. The job hunt was humiliating and slow, and after a month all my best supporters--mom, dad, aunt Karen--began to lose any trace of hope when they would talk to me about the hunt. It wasn't until late May that I found a job, not as a lawyer, and not at a high power law firm, but as a paralegal for the IRS in Chicago.
When people would ask I would say I was taking a job with the federal government and tell them nothing more. I didn't have the heart to tell anyone (who I thought wouldn't find out) that I was going to be looking up cases and photocopying reports for real attorneys. But, disappointing as it was, federal jobs mean federal pay scales, and the money, though it wouldn't compare to private work, was not too bad. Not bad at all for a guy who had $120,000 in loan debt and had gone two months without any job offers. Although heartbreaking, the decision was easy. I was off to the Second City to enter the exciting world of tax law research.
On the day I arrived in town I extended my debt even more by signing closing papers for a Lexington Park condominium, unit 1947. It was my very own one bedroom with den in the heart of Chicago's southside, "starting in the low 200s."
Lexington Park was named after the Lexington Hotel, which sat on the same plot of ground until 1995. It's probably alright to name a residential building after the old hotel, but you wouldn't want to name your kid after it. The Lexington Hotel had a shady history, at best.
Built in 1892 for the opening of the World's Columbian Exposition, perhaps better known as the Chicago World's Fair, the hotel was supposed to provide luxury residences and accommodations to fair guests. With the closing of the fair, demand substantially fell. Once it was discovered that the hotel was just down Indiana Ave. from H.H. Holmes's infamous "murder castle," demand died, and the hotel fell into disrepair. This is probably why a young, up-and-coming entrepreneur decided to pick up the property on the cheap and establish his headquarters there.
In 1928 Al Capone bought the Lexington Hotel, placed armed guards all along the bottom floor and all around the block, and ran his criminal empire from 22nd Street (later renamed) and Michigan Ave. The hotel would serve as his headquarters until Capone was arrested in 1938, and shipped off to Alcatraz where his body and mind would slowly be ravaged by syphilis. The hotel would outlast Capone, but didn't fair much better.
The associations between the Lexington Hotel, crime, Capone, and Chicago's seedy underside were two strong. With no other entrepreneurs chomping at the bit, the hotel slide into a brothel, and then a low-rent residential hotel, which is a nice way of saying crack/flop house. The Lexington Hotel was declared blight and the city condemned it in 1980. For fifteen years it sat vacant, it's only wholesome use being as a back drop in the photographs of old tourists, mostly men who remembered seeing Capone's exploits on the news reels as small boys.
In 1995 the Lexington was finally demolished, razed clean to the ground. The building was a historical site, and a lot of old Chicagoans were angry at the time, but the city had had enough of the rats and drug dealers that infested the area. A decade would pass before the recollections of the prostitutes, crimes, and mob bosses were sufficiently vanished. Buildings can be torn down faster than memories. In a turn of good fortune, the southside started to become revitalized, just in time for the White Sox to bring home the 2005 World Series trophy and set it on the Chicago mantel. Pleased with the change they saw, the Chieftain Construction company decided the Lexington lot had sat fallow long enough. In 2007 ground was broken for thirty-one stories of trendy urban condos--a whole tower of glass, faux granite, and stainless steel appliances.
When I moved here I didn't know anything about H.H. Holmes, mobsters, or the Lexington Hotel brothel. Even if I had known, I wouldn't have changed my decision. I'm not superstitious. A few months ago I would have been happy to learn they built the place on an Indian graveyard; it would've given me a decent little bargaining chip when I was negotiating the price in the low 200s.
Thursday, June 25, 2009
Killer Serials--The Ghost of Al Capone is My Roommate
Part I--The Windy City
In 1492 Columbus came to the Americas. This is a well known among English-speakers, because that year happens to rhyme with the color of the ocean. Far fewer people know what happened 401 years later--The World's Columbian Exposition. "Exposition" doesn't rhyme so neatly as "blue."
In 1889 France built a tower out of scrap metal and invited the world to come have a look. Food was served and they called it the "Exposition Universelle." I don't know how many people were invited, or who répondez s'il vous plaî-ed, but 28,000,000 people showed up. The whole thing was an incredible success; the U.S. became jealous.
To understand the national reaction, you have to remember the United States was dating England exclusively. They broke up, and the U.S. scored France on the rebound. The two started hanging out, talked together about how fat and ugly England was, and had a whirlwind romance. The United States was going through a revolution. It was fun and exciting. We got some sugar from France, in terms of money and naval support. The mutual love was commemorated with his-and-her statues of women holding torches. Soon France got into it's own revolution and war, and came looking for similar support. Under the direction of President Washington, the U.S. stopped answering France's calls. France drove by the house a couple of times, but the U.S. pretended we weren't home. It was mean, but we were still young, immature, and didn't know how to deal with strong emotions and socially delicate situations.
When the Exposition Universelle made France the belle of the international ball, our Congress couldn't stand it. It's hard to have a lot of people paying attention to your ex. The U.S. had to have another ball. Now. Congressional committees, working as fast as Congressional Committees can, narrowed down the possible venues to three American cities: Washington D.C., New York, and Chicago. New York was the gem of the country. D.C. was the nation's capital. Chicago, by contrast, was a stinking expanse of rail yards, slaughter houses, cattle yards, mud streets, and run down tenaments.
Illinois was the American frontier--everything West being rocks, dirt, pine trees, Native Americans, gold miners, and Mormons.
Whatever Chicagoans lacked in sophistication, they made up for with heart. If you've ever lived and fallen in love with a city that's considered provincial, you'll understand how readily defensive the tip of the tongue becomes. The people of Chicago were so adamant in blustering boasts of their city's merits, that New Yorker's, in derision, started calling Chicago "The Windy City."
New York could make fun and tease all they wanted. Congress gave Chicago the Columbian Exposition. To stick it to France, Chicago was going to throw the world a party on the 400th anniversary of an Italian, sailing for Spain, trying to reach India, accidentally landing in America. What could be more natural?
I'm not trying to show off. I never would've learned any of this if I hadn't met Al.
In 1492 Columbus came to the Americas. This is a well known among English-speakers, because that year happens to rhyme with the color of the ocean. Far fewer people know what happened 401 years later--The World's Columbian Exposition. "Exposition" doesn't rhyme so neatly as "blue."
In 1889 France built a tower out of scrap metal and invited the world to come have a look. Food was served and they called it the "Exposition Universelle." I don't know how many people were invited, or who répondez s'il vous plaî-ed, but 28,000,000 people showed up. The whole thing was an incredible success; the U.S. became jealous.
To understand the national reaction, you have to remember the United States was dating England exclusively. They broke up, and the U.S. scored France on the rebound. The two started hanging out, talked together about how fat and ugly England was, and had a whirlwind romance. The United States was going through a revolution. It was fun and exciting. We got some sugar from France, in terms of money and naval support. The mutual love was commemorated with his-and-her statues of women holding torches. Soon France got into it's own revolution and war, and came looking for similar support. Under the direction of President Washington, the U.S. stopped answering France's calls. France drove by the house a couple of times, but the U.S. pretended we weren't home. It was mean, but we were still young, immature, and didn't know how to deal with strong emotions and socially delicate situations.
When the Exposition Universelle made France the belle of the international ball, our Congress couldn't stand it. It's hard to have a lot of people paying attention to your ex. The U.S. had to have another ball. Now. Congressional committees, working as fast as Congressional Committees can, narrowed down the possible venues to three American cities: Washington D.C., New York, and Chicago. New York was the gem of the country. D.C. was the nation's capital. Chicago, by contrast, was a stinking expanse of rail yards, slaughter houses, cattle yards, mud streets, and run down tenaments.
Illinois was the American frontier--everything West being rocks, dirt, pine trees, Native Americans, gold miners, and Mormons.
Whatever Chicagoans lacked in sophistication, they made up for with heart. If you've ever lived and fallen in love with a city that's considered provincial, you'll understand how readily defensive the tip of the tongue becomes. The people of Chicago were so adamant in blustering boasts of their city's merits, that New Yorker's, in derision, started calling Chicago "The Windy City."
New York could make fun and tease all they wanted. Congress gave Chicago the Columbian Exposition. To stick it to France, Chicago was going to throw the world a party on the 400th anniversary of an Italian, sailing for Spain, trying to reach India, accidentally landing in America. What could be more natural?
I'm not trying to show off. I never would've learned any of this if I hadn't met Al.
Tuesday, June 23, 2009
Bad Call
Welcome to my average summer day.
6:30 Awake.
7:00 Law of Moses.
8:15 Drive to law school--predominantly listen to sports talk radio.
9:00 Lending Law.
11:00 Work out--mostly watch ESPN and CNN.
12:30 Drive home--predominantly listen to sports talk radio.
1:30 Read law books; research legal issues.
4:00 Drive back to law school--predominantly listen to sports talk radio.
6:00 Administrative Law.
8:00 Drive home--predominantly listen to sports talk radio.
Law. Sports. Law. Sports. Forgive me if my thoughts lack diversity, but here is a nexus (non-lexis type).
Enter Lee Cider.
This man stole Lance Armstrong's bike. Clever? No. Criminal? Certainly. Kind of funny? Maybe.
For his crime of bike rustling, Mr. Cider will spend three years in prison thinking about the folly of stealing the bike of the most famous cyclist in the history of the world. (Did he think he would Craigslist it? Pawn it?)
Now let's move to the top side of the sports world.
Meet Dante Stallworth.
One evening he spent the whole night getting liquored up, got behind the wheel of his Bentley, and killed an innocent pedestrian at 7:00 AM. For this not-at-all-funny and just-as-certain crime, Mr. Stallworth will spend a grand total of 24 days in jail and perform 1,000 hours of community service.
I know this isn't particularly entertaining, but given the mental neighborhood I live in, I can't help but to find this seriously disturbing and grotesque.
Thursday, June 18, 2009
Vain Ambitions
My dog is obsessive. I don't know if it was nature or nurture, but I feel part way responsible. Regardless...
I'm always trying to convince him that he would be happier if he could mentally let go: stop thinking about the bird outside, the reflection my watch is making on the ceiling, or the squeaky I set on top of the fridge.
He refuses to be comforted. He can stare and wait and whine and dance and always, always keep up the stare. He cannot be diverted, appeased, or reasoned with. He is locked in a marriage between himself and fantasy, which thunder, lightening, earthquake, and gale cannot divorce.
Would Churchill train a dog to never, never, never give up? Is not discretion the better part of valor? Should not a covenant impetuously made when broken reveal a virtue?
I don't know. But I do know that I woke up in the middle of the night to grab my laptop, jot down this poem, and cannonball right back into sleep. I call it "O Coyote."
O' Coyote...
Your lust for roadrunners
is your undoing.
I'm always trying to convince him that he would be happier if he could mentally let go: stop thinking about the bird outside, the reflection my watch is making on the ceiling, or the squeaky I set on top of the fridge.
He refuses to be comforted. He can stare and wait and whine and dance and always, always keep up the stare. He cannot be diverted, appeased, or reasoned with. He is locked in a marriage between himself and fantasy, which thunder, lightening, earthquake, and gale cannot divorce.
Would Churchill train a dog to never, never, never give up? Is not discretion the better part of valor? Should not a covenant impetuously made when broken reveal a virtue?
I don't know. But I do know that I woke up in the middle of the night to grab my laptop, jot down this poem, and cannonball right back into sleep. I call it "O Coyote."
O' Coyote...
Your lust for roadrunners
is your undoing.
Tuesday, June 16, 2009
Weighing My Options...
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
Rules of Engagement
I have over a decade of experience in dating. Ladies, here are some things I've learned that might help you out. (These are general rules, and I truly hope not to offend--just because the rule is often true, doesn't mean it's true in your case.)
R.1: Is his belt braided and leather? Move on; you can do better.
R.2: If his tips are spiky, frosted, and blond, then throw him back; there's a better fish in the pond.
R.3: If he's wearing any part of the sea, then he's probably not fit for thee.
R.4: If there's a ring on his thumb, he's probably dumb.
Also, don't date a guy who wears his cellphone on his belt, or wears a bluetooth headset throughout the day. I don't have rhymes for those, but, come on, it just makes sense.
R.1: Is his belt braided and leather? Move on; you can do better.
R.2: If his tips are spiky, frosted, and blond, then throw him back; there's a better fish in the pond.
R.3: If he's wearing any part of the sea, then he's probably not fit for thee.
R.4: If there's a ring on his thumb, he's probably dumb.
Also, don't date a guy who wears his cellphone on his belt, or wears a bluetooth headset throughout the day. I don't have rhymes for those, but, come on, it just makes sense.
Tuesday, February 24, 2009
Best of Week
Best Conversation:
Me: Oh look! A squirrel... You're a cute little squirrel, aren't you?
S: [Looks and blinks.]
Me: Yes, you are.
S: [Runs away.]
Best Quote:
Rudeness is the weak man’s imitation of strength.
-Eric Hoffer
Best Worse Joke I Made Up:
Q. What is a ghost's favorite restaurant?
A. Cafe BooRio.
(A spin-off of joke: Q. What's a Ghost's favorite food? A. Booritos.)
Best Laffy-Taffy Joke:
Q. What do you call a chicken crossing the street?
A. Poultry in motion.
Best Moment Amongst Adults:
Hugging Brian.
Best Moment Amongst Adolescents:
Teaching the teacher's quorum about the Good Samaritan, service to the poor, and fast offerings.
Best Moment Amongst New Borns:
Teaching new nephew, aka Douglass Fredrick Socks, how to escape from the hospital, make it to the freeway, and get to the airport.
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
Gaming Law
I tend to think in laws lately. It makes for horrible conversation. And I'm likely to pretend like you're saying something your not because you weren't careful enough with your language even though I know full well what you are really talking about and likely agree.
Sorry.
Here is something that is not a conversation that I have ruined:
§ 1-101-Holding
1-101-1: This section, 1-101 et seq., shall be titled "Holding."
1-101-2: It is hereby required that any and all participating parties shall know when to "hold 'em."
(a) Knowledge of when to "hold 'em" share be present in participant before act of holding 'em, and is made manifest by
(1) A correct understanding of the cards, including suit and value, of each of the cards participant holds.
(2) A reasonable assessment of the value of the cards mentioned in §1-101-2(a)(1), whether individually, in aggregate, or in any combination thereof, and an understanding of whether or not those cards are likely to be of superior quality than any other opponents in relation to the size of the amount in controversy.
I could go on...
Sorry.
Here is something that is not a conversation that I have ruined:
§ 1-101-Holding
1-101-1: This section, 1-101 et seq., shall be titled "Holding."
1-101-2: It is hereby required that any and all participating parties shall know when to "hold 'em."
(a) Knowledge of when to "hold 'em" share be present in participant before act of holding 'em, and is made manifest by
(1) A correct understanding of the cards, including suit and value, of each of the cards participant holds.
(2) A reasonable assessment of the value of the cards mentioned in §1-101-2(a)(1), whether individually, in aggregate, or in any combination thereof, and an understanding of whether or not those cards are likely to be of superior quality than any other opponents in relation to the size of the amount in controversy.
I could go on...
Friday, February 6, 2009
Heroes and Good Guys
This morning I was thinking about this man:
Captain Chesley Sullenberger III. What a man! What a name! Braving near death, remaining cool under pressure, and saving hundreds of lives in the process. Could this story be any more perfect?
Perhaps.
On the news this morning they were calling him a hero. I was fully on board. But then, after a moments thought, I wished we had another word for this man--some kind of word that meant "a really good guy," or "an individual of far above average constitution."
I'm just not comfortable with a "hero" being thwarted by a small gaggle of geese. I don't want Batman succumbing to a one eyed duck, or Superman getting into scrapes with pelican with a nasty scar on his face. Let's not allow our heroes to run afoul of common foul.
When Sully lands a plan that's been stunned by a death ray, and I think he would, then let's talk "hero."
Captain Chesley Sullenberger III. What a man! What a name! Braving near death, remaining cool under pressure, and saving hundreds of lives in the process. Could this story be any more perfect?
Perhaps.
On the news this morning they were calling him a hero. I was fully on board. But then, after a moments thought, I wished we had another word for this man--some kind of word that meant "a really good guy," or "an individual of far above average constitution."
I'm just not comfortable with a "hero" being thwarted by a small gaggle of geese. I don't want Batman succumbing to a one eyed duck, or Superman getting into scrapes with pelican with a nasty scar on his face. Let's not allow our heroes to run afoul of common foul.
When Sully lands a plan that's been stunned by a death ray, and I think he would, then let's talk "hero."
Thursday, February 5, 2009
Best of Week
Best quote I've read in a week:
Education is the ability to listen to almost anything without losing your temper or your self-confidence -Robert Frost, United Press International
Best thought I've had in a week:
Once you think you're better than anyone else, acting foolishly and with great impropriety will almost inevitably follow.
Best moment I had in a week:
Watching three of my teachers getting up during fast and testimony meeting.
Best joke I made up in the past week:
Q. What is a dog's least favorite kind of disaster?
A. A CATastrophie.
Best mariner rhyme I made up during the past week:
Red sky at dawn, the buffet line will be long; yellow sky at morn, don't touch Captain's fog horn.
Monday, February 2, 2009
Rice, Rice, Baby
Read Interview with a Vampire over the weekend. It was great. Totally gripping.
This is my favorite excerpt:
"So where do you see yourself in five years," Mr. Flemming asked as he slightly leaned forward over the table. Steven thought about his answer. "Is he on to me?" he wondered. After a moment's pause Steven also leaned forward slightly, gave Mr. Flemming a confident and cold stare, and responded, "I don't know. Drinking blood?"
This is my favorite excerpt:
"So where do you see yourself in five years," Mr. Flemming asked as he slightly leaned forward over the table. Steven thought about his answer. "Is he on to me?" he wondered. After a moment's pause Steven also leaned forward slightly, gave Mr. Flemming a confident and cold stare, and responded, "I don't know. Drinking blood?"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)